Complaints from gay activists that Canterbury is not 'gay-friendly' enough have made the national newspapers.

Following the Kentish Gazette's exclusive report this week that complaints had been made by members of Pride in Canterbury to the local government watchdog, the story has appeared in more than one national daily.

Canterbury City Council has been accused of failing to offer opportunites to attract so-called 'pink tourism' or opening facilities which openly welcome the gay community, such as bars and nightclubs.

Speaking to kmfm's Antony Masters, Andrew Brettell (pictured right) of Pride in Canterbury feels they've been let down.

He said: "They (the City Council) imply they are very much involved with what we want to do and we don't find that to be the case.

"Their policy has always been that they want the community to make all of the initiatives. Over time we've had various events, including talks on Oscar Wilde, we've done two play readings with themes that are of interest to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community."

"The head of culture Janice McGuinness has not attended any of our events and the diversity officer has attended one and only one. Incidentally, she left in February and we are not aware of any moves to replace her."

Listen: Andrew Brettell tells kmfm's Antony Masters the City Council haven't done enough

Mr Brettell also confirmed that since 2006, only one Conservative councillor has formally attended an LGBT event in the city.

Since 2005/06, Pride in Canterbury have received more than £4,000 in funding through the City Council grants system to identify the needs of the gay community and address their concerns.

He added: "We're grateful for the funding we've received, but it's not our prime concern.

"It seems to us that we're in a bit of a situation similar to parents who throw their money at their children and think that's all they want and they don't have any other needs.

"We feel we want much more from the council than just the funding. Becuase of the indifference we've received, we won't be applying for any further funding and we will take their logo off all our publicity and our literature."